(Kanwa news March 3, 1999) Compared with the TMD, the US National Missile
Defence (NMD) has pounded at the Chinese military theorists in a more
practical manner. A Chinese strategic scholar indicates to the KWIC reporter
that the TMD is now only a project under "exploration" and its political
significance well exceeds its usage in the actual combat. The reason why
Taiwan is so concerned about such a topic is that it hopes to enhance the
atmosphere of the political relationship between Japan, the USA, and Taiwan.
In addition, the USA will not see the military strength between the two
sides of the Taiwan Strait out of balance. However, quite a few scholars
believe that at the current stage, the US NMD development program is
intended to be directly aimed at the limited "second nuclear counter-attack"
capability of China and the threat of the NMD is more practical than that of
the TMD. The NMD will really force China to increase its military investment
and to review its existing strategic thinking of "the limited nuclear
retaliation".
According to the US NMD program, the first three years will be spent on the
development of the national missile defence system and another three years
will be used for its deployment. The USA will decide in 2000 whether or not
it will deploy the national missile defence system. If it is deemed
necessary, the USA will first deploy in one area the land-based interceptive
missiles within three years, i.e. by the year 2003, in order to gain the
initial combat capability. The process from the development of the NMD to
the decision to deploy it involves around 2.5 billion US dollars while the
actual deployment of one such system including 100 interceptive missiles
costs about 7.5 billion US dollars. Thus, the total comes to 10 billion US
dollars. One NMD system can handle the attacks of five to twelve ICBMs on
the USA. It is exactly equivalent to the "second counter-attack capability"
China possesses against the USA.
Obviously, the NMD program is a new provocation to China. It is worth
attention what new changes China will make in its theory of nuclear
deterrence and how it will associate the theory with the so-called "military
struggle to safeguard the territorial integrity", in addition to the
possible increase in its ICBMs within a short period of time and to the
intensification of its confrontation methods like the multi-warhead attack
effectiveness etc..
As early as the crisis in the Taiwan Strait in 1996, China published the
pictures of the DF5 ICBM and the commander of the Second Artillery claimed
in an exclusive interview with the English-Language China Daily that China
had the capability to repulse any nuclear attacks that came from the
outside. All these have demonstrated that China has indeed extensively
applied its nuclear deterrence. It was the first time in history for China
to show its strength through the nuclear deterrence under the circumstances
where there existed no external nuclear blackmail (Kanwa news).